We decided to go very traditional with the guys look- bow ties, no vests. I think this is so sexy and romantic- but it might just be that I am also a sucker for Cary Grant.
I think that I found this picture on the Knot, but it has been in my files for so long that I can't remember! Please let me know if you know :)
Based on our research, tuxes were a lot like wedding gowns. You could really go to town with the high end designers and fabrics, you could find a middle ground at a department store or you could find yourself a great deal at a warehouse store. We started with the warehouse stores. We were happily surprised at what we found at Mr. Peacock's favorite place for inexpensive suits- Cosmo's Designer Direct. Their tagline is "3 for 1 suits" (dot com). They also offer three for one shirts, socks and shoes. Included in their suit selection were a variety of tuxedos at different price points. We found a very nice, traditional tux for $299 (the lowest price point)- which broke down to 3 tuxes at $100 a piece.
Mr. Peacock had been part of several tuxedo rentals gone wrong and though it might not be so crazy to offer this as an option to his bridal party. He did a little research and found a place that would sell him a tux shirt, bow tie, cumberbund, studs and cufflinks for $100. The guys could either rent their tux for $150 or buy it for $200. It worked out perfectly. A few already owned tuxedos, and no one was asking them to rent just to match the other dudes. Out of the 7 remaining, 5 decided to buy, which led to a fun trip to Cosmo's on a Sunday morning for fittings. My Grampy wanted a new black suit, which kept us at a multiple of three. The two that wanted to rent just coordinated it on their own, therefore lessening the chance of a huge mess-up due to the confusions of a group order. The purchased tuxes came in a week later with no problems whatsoever. I cannot wait to see those guys in their nicely tailored suits that morning- hubba hubba!
Has anyone else gone this route? Did any grooms choose to buy rather than rent?
No comments:
Post a Comment